WSH-ARI

[Washington Capitals GM]

To :
C Joe Pavelski TWF 89 $6,000,000 UFA 2019 (31)-
D John Moore DFD 83 $2,500,000 RFA 2018 (24)-
D Matt Irwin TWD 81 $1,500,000 UFA 2017 (27)-
WSH 1st 2016
WSH 3rd 2016

To :
C Martin Hanzal TWF 86 $3,100,000 UFA 2017 (28)-
D Keith Yandle OFD 87 $5,250,000 UFA 2016 (29)-
C Kyle Chipchura GRN 81 $875,000 UFA 2016 (29)-

accepts

[luongod]

yah

[yup]

Reject.
Pavelski for hanzal picks sure
Irwin for chip I guess
Moore for yandle? Nah not good value

[Deleted]

Feb 28, 2015 7:01:37 GMT -8 yup said:

Reject.
Pavelski for hanzal picks sure
Irwin for chip I guess
Moore for yandle? Nah not good value

I see it more like this

Pavelski for Yandle and 3rd
Moore and 1st for Hanzal
Irwin for Chipchura

Accept

[yup]

Feb 28, 2015 7:14:50 GMT -8 @kadri43 said:

Feb 28, 2015 7:01:37 GMT -8 yup said:

Reject.
Pavelski for hanzal picks sure
Irwin for chip I guess
Moore for yandle? Nah not good value

I see it more like this

Pavelski for Yandle and 3rd
Moore and 1st for Hanzal
Irwin for Chipchura

Accept

That's actually retarded lol. Why would you compare pavelski to Yandle diff positions. Yotes already has enough 3/4 dmen. They got good enough depth down the middle there weakness after this trade would be a top 2 dman.

Also moores contract should be UFA not rfa

[Washington Capitals GM]

Moore resigned RFA

[yup]

Feb 28, 2015 13:04:30 GMT -8 Washington Capitals GM said:

Moore resigned RFA

UFA unless I read the rules wrong. If he's 24 or younger after the deal expires he would be rfa

[Washington Capitals GM]

Then why put the option of resigning as RFA or UFA? Kinda dumb

[rk17]

Feb 28, 2015 14:30:00 GMT -8 Washington Capitals GM said:

Then why put the option of resigning as RFA or UFA? Kinda dumb

That's not re-signing as a UFA or RFA, it's asking whether the player is currently an RFA or UFA.

[Washington Capitals GM]

Ohhhhhhhhhh. Makes sense

[luongod]

Feb 28, 2015 12:49:22 GMT -8 yup said:

Feb 28, 2015 7:14:50 GMT -8 @kadri43 said:

I see it more like this

Pavelski for Yandle and 3rd
Moore and 1st for Hanzal
Irwin for Chipchura

Accept

That's actually retarded lol. Why would you compare pavelski to Yandle diff positions. Yotes already has enough 3/4 dmen. They got good enough depth down the middle there weakness after this trade would be a top 2 dman.

Also moores contract should be UFA not rfa

of course you can compare different positions if the trade was pavelski for yandle, would you reject because they're different positions?

[Former Bad News]

I'll let this pass. Seems like both the No-GM rep and Washington have plans for their team.

[yup]

Feb 28, 2015 14:49:34 GMT -8 luongod said:

Feb 28, 2015 12:49:22 GMT -8 yup said:

That's actually retarded lol. Why would you compare pavelski to Yandle diff positions. Yotes already has enough 3/4 dmen. They got good enough depth down the middle there weakness after this trade would be a top 2 dman.

Also moores contract should be UFA not rfa

of course you can compare different positions if the trade was pavelski for yandle, would you reject because they're different positions?

Doesn't matter now as its final but it's a MULTIPLE player trade not yandle for pavelski. Put it this way now the yotes need a top 2 dman. This makes yotes less appealing also. You trade their best dman for 4/5/6 dmen which they already have a bundle of them and trade their best center for basically the same player. You guys should look at team needs/roster before accepting or rejecting. Even yandle for pavelski I would have rejected as I would have looked and saw the yotes roster

[rk17]

Non-Gm hasn't accepted

[Non-GM Representative]

I hate to be this guy, but Philly has a very strong case. I was skeptical about this trade from the beginning, but the Coyotes needed some depth defenseman, but they got one in Stralman recently.
Yandle, although a lower overall, can be said to have similar value to Pavelski because top defenseman are harder to come by. Me and Washington will go back to the drawing board.
Rejected/Final